<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>UKQU | Mandi | Mentions</title>
	<link>https://ukqu.co.uk/members/jamzack/activity/mentions/</link>
	<atom:link href="https://ukqu.co.uk/members/jamzack/activity/mentions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<description>Activity feed mentioning Mandi.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 22:29:55 +0100</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>https://buddypress.org/?v=10.6.3</generator>
	<language>en-GB</language>
	<ttl>30</ttl>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>2</sy:updateFrequency>
	
						<item>
				<guid isPermaLink="false">a0bcd34bf7de38de141d1c03cea56682</guid>
				<title>Tl posted an update: @jamzack Hi.  I was reading your review about the Janome&#8230;</title>
				<link>https://ukqu.co.uk/activity/p/17801/</link>
				<pubDate>Tue, 08 Oct 2019 16:49:52 +0100</pubDate>

									<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href='https://ukqu.co.uk/members/jamzack/' rel="nofollow ugc">@jamzack</a> Hi.  I was reading your review about the Janome HD2200 and I wondered if you knew how it compares to the Heavy Duty singer models – 4423, 4432 etc? I am looking for the most powerful machine for the money as I may have to sew some very thick and unusual materials (i.e. small pamphlets of paper). Was thinking of getting a Singer but my l&hellip;<span class="activity-read-more" id="activity-read-more-17801"><a href="https://ukqu.co.uk/activity/p/17801/" rel="nofollow ugc">[Read more]</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
				
									<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
				
							</item>
		
	</channel>
</rss>